Talk:Uranus

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Uranus article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3: 2 months

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Uranus is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

Uranus is part of the Solar System series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 7, 2007.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 9, 2006	Good article nominee	Not listed
November 7, 2006	Featured topic candidate	Promoted
June 15, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
July 29, 2007	Peer review	Reviewed
August 25, 2007	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
September 29, 2007	Featured article candidate	Promoted
August 27, 2008	Featured topic candidate	Not promoted
June 13, 2021	Featured topic removal candidate	Demoted
June 20, 2022	Featured topic candidate	Promoted
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on March 13, 2004, March 13, 2005, March 13, 2006, March 13, 2007, March 13, 2008, March 13, 2009, March 13, 2010, March 13, 2011, March 13, 2013, March 13, 2016, March 13, 2018, March 13, 2019, March 13, 2021, March 13, 2022, and March 13, 2023.
This article was on the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive for the week of May 22, 2007.
Current status: Featured article

Astronomy: Astronomical objects / Solar System Top‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Top-importance).

There is a request, submitted by Catfurball, for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia.

The rationale behind the request is: "Important".

"Humorous" comments regarding the pronunciation of the name of this planet are inappropriate content for this talk page.

Number of moons inconsistency

"Uranus's 28 natural satellites include 18 known regular moons, ... at a much greater distance from Uranus are the nine known irregular moons."

18 plus 9 does not equal 28; this discrepancy should be addressed. Do "Regular moons" and "Irregular moons" not partition the set of "moons"? (Are there moons which are both regular and irregular? Are there moons which are neither?)

98.110.52.169 (talk) 17:13, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's because for a long while it was 27 and everyone forgot to update this line when a tenth irregular moon was discovered. :) Fixed by changing "nine" to "ten". Double sharp (talk) 03:01, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Use of narrow gaps instead of commas as thousand separators in science articles

According to the Manual of Style, you may use as a thousand separator either a comma or a narrow gap (obtained by using the template {{gaps}}).

Nonetheless, the Manual of Style also states that grouping of digits using narrow gaps is “especially recommended for articles related to science, technology, engineering or mathematics”. This is due to the fact that it's the normalized way in the international standards (ISO/IEC 80000 and International System of Units), and also it's the recommended style by ANSI and NIST.

Proposal: Change to format numbers with gaps (for example, "159354.11 km" instead of "159,354.11 km").

Note: I do the proposal instead of changing it myself because, since it's a featured article, I believe it's better to gain consensus beforehand.

Thanks. RGLago (talk) 17:47, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]